Which Form of Investment – Branch or Company?

Foreign entities can set-up company or branch offices in Vietnam to carry out business activities.

There are several main different aspects between opening a branch office or establishing a foreign owned company in Vietnam.

Conditions

• Permits for establishment of Vietnam-based branches of foreign enterprise shall each have a valid term of five years.
• Foreign enterprise must choose between establishing a 100% foreign capital enterprise or forming a joint-venture with domestic investor or company.

Certificate

• The Branch office needs to apply and obtain the operation license of a Branch;
• A foreign owned company will need to apply and obtain the investment certificate (“IC”) to operate in Vietnam.

Capital

• Optional, foreign entity will decide how much money to invest in branch. The allocation capital for branch is capital for the subordinate units.
• Mandatory, foreign entity will need to provide minimum capital as required by Vietnam Law in conditional investment area.

Obligation of owner

• For branch office in Vietnam, owner takes full responsibility;
• For company, owner takes responsibility within the capital contributed into the company in Vietnam;

Other matters

• For branch office setting up in Vietnam, the procedure is less complicated compared to those for the establishment of a 100% foreign owned company;  the branch office is able to carry out trading and some other activities as stipulated by Vietnam laws and the WTO commitments which Vietnam enters.  The business lines of a branch have to be aligned with the business lines of the headquarter of the foreign entity.
• Setting up foreign owned company would be more complicated than the setting up of the branch office, however this form of investment has more flexibility and freedom as it is a stand alone Vietnam entity recognized under Vietnam laws.

Source: ANT lawyers (http://www.antlawyers.vn/)

Read More

Vietnam to boost enforcement of civil court decisions next year

HCMC – The Ministry of Justice will step up the enforcement of civil court decisions next year, especially those related to the banking sector.

To this end, the ministry will focus on improving regulations on implementation of civil and administrative court decisions, consolidating staff, improving receipt of complaints from citizens, and boosting the use of advanced technology, according to a newly-issued plan for 2017.

Read more:

Civil Matters

Dispute Resolution

Deputy Minister Tran Tien Dung said the successful execution of civil court decisions concerning the banking sector will help facilitate provision of credit for enterprises and citizens.

One of top solutions for next year’s plan is to boost administrative reform and application of high tech to cut time and cost and ensure transparency of information.

According to the ministry, nearly 530,430 civil court decisions have been enforced this year, up 8.53% higher than the original target.

Source: The Saigon Times

Read More

Major realty firms to be inspected

HANOI - The Ministry of Construction is going to inspect a dozen real estate companies, including major ones, a source told the Daily.

Through the periodical checks, inspectors of the ministry will clarify some issues concerning the operations of realty firms, such as their observance of law and policies on planning, quality management and real estate business in 2011-2016.

Reportedly, among the 12 property firms to be examined are those of significant scale such as Vingroup, Sun Group, FLC, Hoa Binh Group, Novaland, Muong Thanh Group, Tan Hoang Minh Group, Bitexco Group, Empire Group, Dai Quang Minh, Phu My Hung Corporation and Nam Thang Long (Cipurtra). Each of these enterprises will undergo a month-long inspection.

In particular, the ministry will look into projects of Muong Thanh Group in Hanoi and Khanh Hoa Province, Bitexco’s projects in HCMC, Cocobay Danang project of Empire, and Dai Quang Minh’s construction of four main roads in Thu Thiem New Urban Area in HCMC.

Such inspection is a regular activity of the Ministry of Construction. Nevertheless, this inspection plan has stoked public curiosity and attention since some real estate projects have recently stirred up public concerns. Particularly, Muong Thanh Group has just been examined, with a number of irregularities detected such as violating height limits.

Speaking at a review conference for 2016 last Friday, Deputy Minister of Construction Le Quang Hung said the Government had assigned his agency to review urban planning. The ministry has already ordered inspections into controversial projects in Hanoi this week.

Source The Saigon Times

Read More

Foreign firms expand presence in retail market

HANOI – Foreign companies are establishing a stronger presence on the fast growing Vietnamese retail market, according to a report which the Ministry of Industry and Trade released last Friday.

Foreign direct investment enterprises now hold a 17% retail market share in the segment of shopping centers and supermarkets, 70% in convenience stores, 15% in minimarts, and around 50% in online, TV and phone shopping, said the report.

These percentages are not too high but the rising presence of foreign investors in the retail market can be seen in major cities. For instance, Thailand’s Central Group has taken over the entire stake of France’s Casino Group in Big C Vietnam, and another Thai conglomerate, TCC Holding, has acquired Metro Cash and Carry Vietnam.

Other foreign business groups such as South Korea’s Lotte and Japan’s Aeon have been steadily expanding, with plans to double or triple their stores in Vietnam in the coming years.

The swift expansion of foreign firms has piled pressure on local retailers. Domestic goods suppliers have also felt the pinch as foreign retailers are developing their own goods brands for sale at their stores.

According to the Ministry of Industry and Trade, total retail sales of goods and services last year rose 10.2% year-on-year to VND3,530 trillion (US$156.7 billion).

Business-to-customer (B2C) transactions were estimated to double from the US$2.2 billion recorded in 2013.

Source The Saigon Times

Read More

Thailand issued the final determination in the antidumping investigation against imports of Certain stainless pipe and tube from certain countries including Vietnam

On 26 September 2016, Vietnam Competition Authority received the information from Vietnam Trade Office in Thailand that the Department of Foreign Trade (DFT) under Ministry of Commerce of Thailand published the final determination of the antidumping investigation against imports of Certain stainless pipe and tube from Korea, China, Taiwan and Vietnam

-  Date of initiation: 17 September 2015

- Subject product: stainless pipe and tube under HS: 7305.31.10.000; 7306.11.10.000; 7306.11.90.000; 7306.21.00.000; 7306.40.10.010; 7306.40.10.020; 7306.40.20.010; 7306.40.20.020; 7306.40.30.010; 7306.40.30.020; 7306.40.90.010; 7306.40.90.020; 7306.61.00.021 and 7306.61.00.022

In the final determination, the antidumping margin applicable to exporters of Vietnam is 310.74%.

Earlier, on 7 July 2016, DFT issued notice of essential facts and announced about holding a public hearing for the case.

Source Vietnam Competition Authority

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ANT Lawyers is a reputable law firm in Vietnam with English speaking lawyers whom understand the laws of Vietnam within the business and the local culture context.

For Vietnam legal matters or services, the clients could reach ANT Lawyers, the exclusive Vietnam law firm members via email at ant@antlawyers.vn or call the telephone at +848 35202779.

Read More

Australia Antidumping Commission (Department of Industry, Innovation and Science) initiation of an Investigation into Alleged Dumping and subsidisation on Zinc Coated (Galvanised) Steel Exported from the Republic of India, Malaysia and Vietnam

On October 7, according to the information received by Vietnam Competition Authority from Vietnam Trade Office in Sydney, Australia Anti-dumping Commission (Department of Industry, Innovation and Science) initiation of an Investigation into Alleged Dumping and subsidisation on Zinc Coated (Galvanised) Steel Exported from the Republic of India, Malaysia and Vietnam (Malaysia is subject to the anti-dumping investigation only).

Earlier, on 22 August 2016, an application was lodged by BlueScope Steel Ltd, a manufacturer of zinc coated (galvanised) steel (the goods) in Australia. The application seeks the publication of a dumping duty and a countervailing duty notice in respect of the goods exported to Australia from India, Malaysia and Vietnam.

Background:

1. Petitioner: BlueScope Steel Ltd.

2. Subject product:

- Zinc coated/ galvanized steel

- HS: 7210.49.00, 7212.30.00, 7225.92.00 and 7226.99.00.

3. Period of investigation of dumping and subsidisation: 01/7/2015 – 30/06/2016

4. Period of investigation of injury: từ 01/7/2012

5. Alleged dumping margin: 27,2%

6. Estimated subsidy margin: Above negligible level

7. Investigated subsidy programs: preferential import tariff rates, support for projects manufacturing priority industrial products; incentives contingent upon export performance; incentives for domestic businesses; incentives for foreign invested enterprises; export promotion; trade promotion; preferential credit; assistance for commercial development in mountainous, island and ethnic minority areas;assistance to enterprises facing difficulties due to objective reasons; incentives for investment projects in science and technology; incentives on corporate income tax; incentives on non-agricultural land.

8. Injury: The application alleges that the goods have been exported to Australia at prices less than their normal value and were in receipt of countervailable subsidies and that the dumping and subsidisation has caused material injury to the Australian industry through: price suppression, reduced sales revenue, reduced profit and profitability, reduced employment,  reduced return on investment

This is the 7th dual anti-dumping and anti-subsidy cases against exports of Vietnam in recent years since 2009, and the 2nd dual anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations by Australia against exports of Vietnam

Source Vietnam Competition Authority

Read More

Special mechanism for Long Thanh airport project gets thumbs-up

HCMC – Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc has told the Ministry of Transport to design a special compensation, support and resettlement mechanism for the Long Thanh airport project in Dong Nai Province, the Vietnam News Agency reports.

The ministry should coordinate with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, the government of Dong Nai Province, and relevant agencies to map out a plan for compensation, support and resettlement, treat it as a separate component, and report results to the PM.

The special plan should be submitted to the National Assembly (NA) before the NA passes the feasibility study for the big-ticket airport project.

The Transport Ministry will work with authorities of Dong Nai to devise a policy framework for compensation and resettlement assistance.

The project would affect around 4,700 households with nearly 15,000 people in Binh Son, Suoi Trau, Cam Duong, Long An, Long Phuoc and Bac Can communes.

Read more:

Capital Conditions in Air Transportation Business

Why Investors Should Set-up Business in Phu Quoc

Around 40 kilometers from HCMC and 30 kilometers from Bien Hoa City, the airport would meet 4F standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

Phase one of the project is scheduled to get off the ground in 2019, with one runway and one terminal to be put into operation by 2025 to handle 25 million passengers and 1.2 million tons of cargo a year.

One more runway and terminal would be built in the second phase to increase the airport’s annual capacity to 50 million passengers and 1.5 million tons of cargo. The airport would handle 100 million and five million tons a year after phase three is complete.

More than VND336.76 trillion (over US$16 billion) will be needed for the project, including nearly US$5.5 billion for the first phase. The funding will be sourced from the State budget, official development assistance (ODA) loans, investment of enterprises, proceeds from equitization of State-owned enterprises and other sources.

Read More