ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

ANT Lawyers

Vietnam Law Firm with English Speaking Lawyers

8.24.2021

Anti-dumping Measures for H-shaped Steel Products From Malaysia Remain in Place

On August 18th, 2021, the Ministry of Industry and Trade issued the Decision No. 1975/QD-BCT on the application of official anti-dumping tax on some H-shaped steel products originating from Malaysia (“Decision No. 1975/QD-BCT”). Accordingly, the anti-dumping measures against a number of H-shaped steel products originating from Malaysia continue to be maintained under Decision No. 1162/QD-BCT dated April 02nd, 2021 of the Minister of Industry and Trade.

 


Anti-dumping Law Firm in Vietnam

The Ministry of Industry and Trade started investigating the case on August 24th, 2020, the investigation process was carried out in accordance with the laws. On the basis of information collected from related parties, the Ministry of Industry and Trade has carefully considered and assessed the level of dumping of H-shaped steel products imported from Malaysia, the damages to the domestic industry as well as to assess the socio-economic impacts, including impacts on downstream industries and consumers.

According to DecisionNo. 1975/QD-BCT, the anti-dumping tax rate for some H-shaped steel products originating from Malaysia, holding HS codes: 7216.33.11, 7216.33.19, 7216.33.90, 7228.70.10 and 7228.70.90 is 10.64%. This tax rate is lower than the tax rate applied to H-shaped steel imported from China (about 22% on average) and also much lower than the proposed tax rate of the domestic manufacturing industry (16.30%). This anti-dumping tax is effective from August 21st, 2021 and has an application term of 05 years, the term above could be changed or extended in accordance with the laws.

In order to have a basis for determining the origin of imported goods subject to anti-dumping tax, the Customs authority will check the proofs of origin of goods, including:

(i) Certificate of Origin (C/O); or

(ii) Documents certifying the origin of goods in accordance with the provisions of:

-ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement;

-Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP);

-Free Trade Agreement between the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the European Union (EVFTA);

-Free Trade Agreement between the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

The above information is the regulation on application of official anti-dumping tax on some H-shaped steel products originating from Malaysia, organizations and individuals producing and exporting the above goods from Malaysia and relevant organizations and individuals need to know and implement according to the laws.

ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow the legal developments to update client.  Our international trade dispute lawyers in Vietnam  and consultants represent client in international trade disputes including anti-dumping cases at Vietnam authorities.

 


8.22.2021

Vietnam Promulgated Preferential Import-Export Tariff Schedule to Implement UKVFTA Agreement

On May 21, 2021, the Government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 53/2021/ND-CP on preferential export tariffs and special preferential import tariffs of Vietnam to implement the Free Trade Agreement between the Vietnam and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the period 2021-2022 (“Decree No. 53/2021/ND-CP”).

 


Decree No.53/2021/ND-CP promulgating the Preferential Export Tariff and the Special Preferential Import Tariff of Vietnam to implement the Free Trade Agreement between the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Union United Kingdom and Northern Ireland (UKVFTA) period 2021 – 2022 and conditions to enjoy preferential export tax rates, special preferential import taxes under the UKVFTA. The specific tax rates for each year of each item are specified in the appendices of that Decree.

Accordingly, in order to enjoy the preferential export tax rate under the UKVFTA, goods exported from Vietnam that are eligible for the preferential export tax rate specified in Decree No.53/2021/ND-CP must meet the following conditions: (i) Being imported into the United Kingdom; (ii) Having a transport document (copy) showing that the destination is the United Kingdom; (iii) Having the import customs declaration of the export consignment of Vietnamese origin imported into the United Kingdom (copy and translation in English or Vietnamese in case the language is showed on the declaration is not in English).

In addition, imported goods eligible for special preferential import tax rates under the UKVFTA must fully satisfy the following conditions: (i) Belonging to the special preferential import tariff schedule specified in the Appendix II promulgated together with Decree No.53/2021/ND-CP; (ii) Being imported into Vietnam from: The United Kingdom or Vietnam (Goods imported from the free trade zone into the domestic market); (iii) Meeting the regulations on origin of goods and have proof of origin according to the provisions of the UKVFTA.

Information above are the provisions on the import and export tariff of goods under the UKVFTA, goods import and export enterprises need to pay attention to be able to apply the import preferential tariff, in order to bring new business highest benefit for the business.

ANT Lawyers in an international trade dispute law firm in Vietnam, recognized by Legal500, IFLR1000. We are an exclusive Vietnam member of Prea Legal, the global law firm network covering more than 150 jurisdictions. The firm provides a range of legal services to multinational and domestic clients. For advice or services request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529

 


8.19.2021

What is Statue of Limitation for Initiating Legal Action According to Arbitral Procedures?

Arbitration law always set the the limitation period for request of dispute resolution. This means that the law applies a specific period for parties to bring the dispute to the arbitration. According to law on arbitration 2010 (“LOA”), unless otherwise provided by specialized law, limitation period for initiating legal action according to arbitral procedures is two years from the time of infringement of lawful rights and interests.

 


Arbitration law firm in Vietnam

There is no regulation in arbitration law regarding consequence of expiration of limitation period, but Civil Code 2015 (“CC”) stipulates that: “if such time limits expire, the right to initiate such legal action shall be lost”. Arbitration council shall not resolve expired requests, which means council shall not judge which parties is right or wrong. Therefore, enterprise needs to request within the statutory time limits in order to be resolved. If not, the request shall not be considered although there was request and related fees. In addition, it should be noted that the Court only applies time limits regulation at the request of a party or the parties provided that such request is filed before the first trial court of first instance makes a judgment, a decision on settlement.

However, there has been cases of non-applicability of limitation periods. Specifically, a limitation period for initiating legal action for a civil case shall not apply in any of the following cases: (i) Request for the protection of personal rights not associated with property; (ii) Request for the protection of ownership rights, unless otherwise provided by Civil Code or relevant laws; (iii) Dispute over land use right as prescribed in the Law on land; (iv) Other cases as provided by law. For instance, dispute over reclaiming deposited property is under case of non-applicability of limitation periods. Specifically, deposited property still belongs to ownership of depositor although the property had been transferred to depositary and reclaiming property is a measure protecting the right of property ownership, while dispute over the protection of ownership rights is under case of non-applicability of limitation periods.

In practice, the time between the time period of filing a lawsuit and the time period of infringement of lawful rights and interests can be longer than two years if there is time periods excluded from limitation periods for initiating legal action or there is re-commencement of limitation period for initiating legal action.

The time period during which one of the following events occurs shall be excluded from limitation periods for initiating legal action: (i) An event of force majeure or other objective hindrance which renders the person with the right to initiate legal action for a civil case or make the request not able to do so within the limitation period; (ii) The person with the right to initiate legal action for a civil case or to make the request is a minor or a legally incapacitated person, a person with limited cognition and behavior control or a person with limited legal capacity, and does not yet have a representative; (iii) The representative of a minor or a legally incapacitated person, a person with limited cognition and behavior control or a person with limited legal capacity has not yet been replaced in case that the representative being natural person dies or the representative being juridical person ceases to exist or in case that the representative, for good reasons, cannot continue his/her representation.

The limitation period for initiating legal action shall re-commence in any of the following cases: (i) The obligor has acknowledged part or all of its obligations to the plaintiff; (ii) The obligor has acknowledged or fulfilled part of its obligations to the plaintiff; (iii) The parties have become reconciled. The limitation period for initiating legal action for a civil case shall re-commence from the date following the date on which the above event occurs. Having said that, it is important to consult with dispute lawyers in Vietnam for the effective dispute resolutions should dispute arise.

ANT Lawyers in an arbitration law firm in Vietnam, recognized by Legal500, IFLR1000. We are an exclusive Vietnam member of Prea Legal, the global law firm network covering more than 150 jurisdictions. The firm provides a range of legal services to multinational and domestic clients. For advice or services request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529.

 


8.18.2021

When Should the Employer Send Notice of Termination of Labour Contract to Employee Before Contract Expiration?

Expiration is one of the circumstances which permit termination of labor contract under the Labor Code 2012. Accordingly, the employer must inform in writing to the employee of the terminating date of labor contract at least 15 days prior to the expiration. Termination of labor relationship in each circumstance must follow different conditions and procedures to ensure the interests and obligations of both employee and employer and avoid potential labour disputes in Vietnam.

 


Labour dispute law firm in Vietnam

Previously, an administrative penalty was applied to violations of the labor contract termination notice mentioned above. If the employer fails to inform the employee, the employer will be subject to a warning or a fine with amount from VND 500,000 to VND 1,000,000. However, the Decree 28/2020/ND-CP issued on March 1st, 2020 by the Government has repealed sanction for this behavior.

If the employee continues to work upon expiration of labor contract, both parties will be required to sign a new labor contract within the next 30 days, otherwise the signed contract will become an indefinite-term. Failure of the employer to inform the labor contract termination to the employee does not mean that the labor relationship is automatically extended after the expiration. If both parties fail to sign a new labor contract within the next 30 days, but the employee still do normal assigned job and is paid a full monthly salary, an indefinite-term labor contract is deemed as entered into by them. Any disputes arising out then will be settled based on provisions of indefinite term labor contract and laws.

The Labor Code 2019 repealed the employer’s informing responsibility upon expiration of labor contract except in a few circumstances such as the employee being sentenced to imprisonment, disciplined, expelled, ..., the employer is required to inform the employee in writing the termination of the labor contract.

ANT Lawyers – A labour dispute law firm in Vietnam with international standard, local expertise and strong international network. We focus on customers’ needs and provide clients with a high quality legal advice and services. For advice or services request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529.